🔗 Share this article

Whenever a prominent prize-giving event approaches, you'll find a clamor for the addition of new categories to acknowledge overlooked contributions and fill the spirits of fans with niche passions.

My colleague has already made for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. So would strategy board titles, which is a passionate advocate's mission. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize because like all single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal stands as crucial and important of all. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre is not a science; it’s very subjective, and inevitably start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why cinema institutions avoid this approach. But it is an essential concession within the realm of interactive entertainment, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies offer these award types recognizing Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these award types effectively encompass numerous genres, making space possible for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No suitable classification appears to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, all very different: the architectural riddles in a particular game, intense tile-matching in a different title, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them between these six categories? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles published annually that have no home at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested small studio competitions.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely during that awards season
• A different innovative game was excluded during that ceremony
• Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment recently
• Just some brain-teasers managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles is of massive significance. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences worldwide continuing this trend for many years.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with popular creative games for the title of highest-selling title ever; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, while interacting with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude many worthy titles.

To emphasize again, these represent titles lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers are working at the demanding boundary game development, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait decades.