🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to copy this path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the steps of this nation and others indicate that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.